I think it does. There should at least be some counterplay against a claimed but protectable Prince, right?
Passive: You are Prince. You are a superior being.
Passive: You are oppressed by society.
Strongman kills
Like just one of them would be enough without drastically changing balance
Passive: You are Prince, you are a superior being, oppressed by the society. You cannot be stopped from your actions by any means (except your own death).
Instead of having the most swingy doublekill on the planet, instead replace 2f1 with a 1-shot strongman kill
Words spoken from a true hero.
Unstoppable (Passive) - You cannot be occupied or redirected at night, even by abilities that bypass such immunities.
Jail (Day) - Jail a player. This ability cannot be redirected. (Infinite uses)
I think this works well with the addition of just a bit of text? (Although I don’t agree with the change but whatever)
Why are we even talking about changing the Prince’s text.
It’s perfect, easy to understand and quick to read.
edge cases
It’s not a change.
It’s a clarification.
Prince can’t be bypassed occed/redirected/stopped from your abilities.
Speaking of Prince-related edge cases, can we fix the exploit where it’s technically possible in sufficiently niche circumstances for a jailed target to act?
I literally pointed out that it’s not because we’ve allowed princes to be reidrected in the past
Moderror
It’s particularly hilarious
But it’s not. We allowed it. The “target changing” thing only applies at night.
Something like “You cannot act while jailed” would suffice I think
I know
But…the memes
For those unaware:
Aeric and Barbara are Court Wizards, Caelyn is any class.
Aeric uses Arcane Empower, then targets Barbara. Barbara uses Arcane Empower, then targets Caelyn. Caelyn is jailed.
Because of the Arcane Empower, Barbara is able to target Caelyn (I’m fine with this part of the interaction). However, because of Barbara’s use of Arcane Empower, Caelyn is now able to act through jail.