For instance Priestess is starting from the premise that if you don’t have a metaphorical voice from the heavens telling you someone is evil, you shouldn’t execute or vig them
and Ici is very much not
No because none of them are actually discussing the sources of their disagreement, they’re discussing downstream consequences and acting like it’s self-evident that they’re right
personally i think being able to make outrageous vig shots with the only possible downside being you shoot an important villager PR is part of the game and should be embraced by designers
1 Like
What’s the point of “you can shoot without the consent of your fellow villagers” if you can only shoot people who the village is sure are wolves?
1 Like
It’s not about consent
It’s about acting responsible and not shooting the next town you see, just because you don’t like them
(I’ve seen that too often)
Ever heard of catching up as BD due to Prince being dead or missing your lynches.
CS is a great tool to buy time so you don’t get into LyLo.
What’s the entry point to be considered a good player?
Do you consider yourself a good player?
How many players on average are “good” in a standard FoL game?
Nothing but Its Usually not possible to determine kills on info given And you need to assume you will guess before Who the right target is to defend (wich as knight would achieve in attackers death) So you can get chance at using same ability knight can use
We physically can’t balance for average players.
That almost always leads to above-average players to be able to abuse the mechanic.