which post were you saying shows TMI (and why)?
Townlean: - Iām not the type of guy to jump on things.
Alice - While I donāt know how to read Alice much, her attitude during today seems Towny and from where I came from sheās been acting with Town motives and wanting Town to stay on track. Additionally I read that Town initiative and she didnāt seem pleased that some people werenāt following what was recommended in there which would only usually come from a Town. She clearly wants Town to try and win instead of messing themselves up and ultimately losing.
Scumlean:
TheBlueElixer - His readlist post earlier striked me as pointless, especially the stating the Nulls part which just seemed like he wanted to expand his readlist to make it seem like he was doing something, which is in my eyes a scummy move. Additionally, he barely bothered to explain his Townleans/Townreads and mostly just stated āI agreed with their vote, fight meā which seems like a horrible example and a horrible reason to think someone is Town. If someone is tunnelling another person that you agree with, thatās a reason. But that wasnāt what was stated.
Also I read my posts from earlier and the replies.
I wasnāt on about classes at the time, I was on about accusations. My bad.
Iāve played FM before.
2 Likes
I know, but people asked for them so I decided to explain them in detail, something I still believe BlueElixer should do.
1 Like
I asked TBE to explain his reads or to just not post them with the amount of Nulls he decided to put an explanation on.
He couldāve easily categorized it:
āAny players not on this are either low posters, zero posters, myself or have no content.ā
Explaning some Null reads are fine, but all of them aināt.
I have no idea how new TBE is to the site, and how many games hes played in. He should not have brought it up though at all, as the discussion that will follow (As we saw with Mode v Alice regarding it)
can lead to bad results.
All i will say is thats how i see the post, and what i felt from reading it.
This one. Screenshooted because I canāt jump to it from Blizerās wall.
Bluebroke the reaction test very deliberatedly for nothing.
For someone to break a reaction test, one of three things:
- They legitimately think that the person doing the test is mistaken. This would come off as an explanation directly to Jane. āYou canāt Grand Trial day 1.ā
- They think the test is absolutely worthless, too obvious to achieve anything. Usually comes in frustration. An example is any old game with Marshal where people told him to shut up on his 3rd redcheck or so. This is always done on purpose to ruin the test.
- They do not need the test for already having a strong bias on the other personās alignment. This is always done on purpose to ruin the test.
First option is eliminated. Now we have to analyze 2 and 3.
By what he saidā¦ Posting it again, here.
He thinks that the test is worthless because if I know and donāt say anything about it, the test will be invalid. He could, on all universes, wait for me to answer the test before saying this, since there was a chance of me replying as if I did not knew how King worked.
Pro-tip: I said at least two times on this game already I have no bloody idea how FoL works. I donāt even know which neutral classes there can spawn or that if you can or not vote day 1. It was completely plausible for me not to know how grand trial worked.
Even if he says something pointing at #2, you can see by analysis that #2 would be nonsense. Only the 3rd bullet point would be remaining. And his reads were not strong until now for him to have absolute confidence I was such a power townie, neither the tone of his reply.
So the test is useless to him because he knows my alignment not by deducion, but by information. And is trying to look like he does not.
1 Like
This would be #1.
But the way he replied, he knew it was a reaction test before he broke it.
So it canāt be #1.
1 Like
Hey just in general if possible like use the quoting system over screenshottingā¦ General warning for like everyone
3 Likes
Iām not sure if I agree with this read but I think itās villagery (based on how sheās trying to analyze the question of whether TBE had TMI on her slot ā sort of like the reasons Alice gave earlier for clearing kat)
1 Like
Honestly, Thats actually a really good line of thinking, and it does make my scumlean on TBE become a scumread looking back at it, because your right, he knew that was a reaction test, yet he decided to stop it anyway, which by itself looks quite scummy, and now looking back at it with this in mind, i agree with you, this looks like TMI tbh.
1 Like
uhhh
Iāve seen her play as scum twice, the first time she was an obvious wolf D1 and got lynched D1 with me trying to CFD off of her because Iām bad, the second time she was an obvious wolf D2 and got lynched D3 (and the only reason she didnāt get lynched D2 was because of her partner faking a redcheck on a villager) (she was somewhat villagery D1 in the second game)
Can you link me this game? I also think their posts have improved but I donāt know how paranoid I should be.