Sounds an arrogant prick who can’t actually explain their arguments convincingly, and a person I’d like to policy lynch if I were town.
If they have a red check there’s no need to be so mad.
Sounds an arrogant prick who can’t actually explain their arguments convincingly, and a person I’d like to policy lynch if I were town.
If they have a red check there’s no need to be so mad.
half the people do nothing expecting the wolves to lynch themsleves
I’ve got a knee jerk response to higher-than-thou people though so I’m not very good at reading if it’s faked.
yep, its rather angry. Now try this
“There is no way Player 1 can be town, with my redcheck on him plus no proven scum tailoring abilities. There is no world where he flips town”
shrugs
beats me.
Tone is only one half the puzzle
tone is half the puzzle. Im mainly coming up with this shit on the fly wheni should be doing algebra 2 hw
and when i should be doing algebra 2 hw im at work
What homework is it
Also /Vote Blue
Policy lynch blue in dead chat BOIS GO GO GO
graphing quadratics with x intercepts
oh okay then
Vote blue with me he’s scum
Bahahahaha.
There are many other better candidates for PLs.
Arete for instance.
what proof do you have to him being scum?
Arete shouldnt be a PL
people like magnus who dont fucking play the game should be PLs. That PL push on magnus was actually genuine
That’s a lot less annoying, but it still seems off. Don’t know why. Probably because I don’t weight mechanical confirmations that much since they’re difficult to confirm themselves.
Problem is for me, I’ve conditioned myself to avoid absolutes (I.e qualify arguments regularly) and over-confidence since that’s you have a proper discussion RL. That doesn’t help me here since hedging is by and large scummy, and it gives me another knee jerk reaction to extreme confidence.
He is insulting people, only scum can insult people town love other players
You know I think Zone has it right
I should just start tunnelling Arete in every game I’m in with them
omg ur right