4 people is kind of excessive. We had the issue of people dying in VLDR1 because of people wandering alone such as Zone roaming alone and Chem ditching me, and I died because I literally rushed alone because I thought that having two guns would protect me. 6 groups of 2 looks to be better especially as we can cover more ground this way.
Agree with this unless a player is under reasonable suspicion of being evil.
Disagree. I don’t think we should keep likely killers alive.
3 Min for groups please personally.
Also if someone kills WITHOUT REASONS then yeah they shouldn’t be kept alive
this mindset is how people die
we need to be “kind of excessive” the first few rounds at least
because groups of 2 can lead to deaths, purposeful or accidental, and the other person will be blamed if it’s an an accident or claim it is if they are guilty.
Safety > covering ground. 3 groups of 4 is more than enough to cover the 6 rooms we have in the 48 hours that roaming is.
I know i’m being cautious, but sorry. It’s part of my wincon to be and it’s in the best interest of people who aren’t bloodthirsty murderers to be cautious as well
I also think that murdering suspicious people is only as a last resort if we have very strong reason to suspect that a person will cause more death than their own death would cause
It’s much better to restrain and question them and keep an eye on them after they are let go.
We need some semblance of order and society for the first few roamings at least.
There is not really any reason to cover ground more quickly. In VLDR, they could play the ambidex game over and over and over again with probably the only incentive to speed it along there being evil people among the group. If we maintain safety, they’ll be put out of play.
