Newbie Forum of Lies 1 - The Blue Dragon and Fool win!

Wat

You have a contradiction:

Either you read the thread and therefore the ā€œweā€ have determined Fire Kitten and I are town conclusion (which means you saw the vote)

OR you didnā€™t read the thread and therefore have no conclusion that Fire and I are town.

I am trying to figure out how both statements are not contradictory

/accuse Wolfy

Before I forget that needs explanation

I think itā€™s you who didnt read the read tbh cause i said this last day

Furthermore there is a 4 and a 5 and 6 to wolfyā€™s case
4) I can kill my attackers
5) I wanted the check so that way to give players d1 info to hunt from
6) None of the above is true and I am a less powerful BD and was baiting scum to kill me

Like so many options exist. I have no desire to help scum focus in until absolutely necessary.

This post is today. Where you said you read yesterday

Captainā€™s vote

So you have read or have you not read the thread today?

Itā€™s okay if people havenā€™t but donā€™t claim you have when you havenā€™t or vice versa

Ngl, I agree with the wolfy vote, baz would be a much better person to vote after wolfy, because right now heā€™s basically repeating what we said.

/Vote Wolfy

I am down with that.

So have you read the last day or have you not? Itā€™s okay if you didnā€™t but donā€™t pretend to have if you havenā€™t or vice versa

I have read both.

That is what prompted my question to you. Of which you have not answered about the discrepancy. Do you feel there is not one and are making a joke in jest?

Just isoed myself and I see that I accused you, so I donā€™t see a discrepancy

This is the issue at hand.

Yes you had a naked ā€œMath is evilā€ read in day one. However first in this case is irrelevant as I do not have any unaddressed discrepancies to my knowledge. If I have not addressed something please point it out. This is how reads form by pointing out things a person doesnā€™t understand and getting clarity.

What I am more concerned with is how Wolfy was rolefishing and I want to know what was in his head. If you want to force the issue go ahead.

Stop gaslighting me

  1. I have brought up a concern.
  2. Instead of addressing said concern you have done ā€œnot me, youā€
    In which I responded where the discrepancy is by pointing out specific posts.
    Then after that you say I am gaslighting you.
    Gaslighting is not only impossible in forum mafia where all someone has to do is scroll up, itā€™s also rather ineffective because someone would have to gaslight a thread which is almost impossible.

My statements are simply that. Statements. If you have nothing to hide then you simply would say you did not see the discrepancy.

Furthermore if such statements are indeed incorrect then someone will point them out as such and therefore my read would change accordingly.

However I see no evidence in which to change my read.

What is Wolfy claiming by the way? Itā€™s very important that we hear it

1 Like

Pretty sure gaslighting is useful in LYLO, or at the end of the day, however itā€™s not useful here.

Ngl, I think he just doesnā€™t understand or is scum, now pointing toward the later.

Agreed Wolfy disappeared from the thread. Wolfy needs to get back here and explain.

1 Like