Incorrect.
Traitors while not knowledgable still give off tells of who they town/scumread and can then know where the traitor thought important which can net scum.
Or if you know an EK exists then you know you have less trust in night actions and have to play the reads game more
The associations are better made later on in the game
Like in FoL21 where I was pretty sure Shuri was GK because I didn’t think any EK would stick their neck out for someone as widely scumread as I was due to a false redcheck, but by the end of it it was basically the only thing going on
And I scumread Shurian based on lack of right guard and associatives.
Stop setting standards for what scum are/aren’t doing. It’s a major pitfall.
Let me clarify
The associations are more accurately made later on in the game
Obviously if you think you can make the links then go for it, but like LT said, they’re flimsy unless you can see some pretty clear signalling.
Oh ofc not, but proficient EKs will keep pressure on their townreads in an effort to let scum coast
Yes associations are flimsy and subject to change that’s why there is continuous testing.
You don’t just not hunt because you don’t “know”. If you “know” it isn’t hunting
Eg Marcus shooting FireKitten was to be expected yet his associations with FireKitten shined a light on him as Unseen King (because I was cult minor detail).
And herein lies one of my flaws
I rely too much on concrete evidence and not enough on digging out oddities in posting or whathaveyou
That’s okay, it’s like learning a new language in some respects 
maybe this is why NFoLs don’t have the greatest track record because vets just end up TLing inevitably
It’s also okay to be 100% wrong. Just effort is a thing
“I don’t know what to say”
Answer whatever comes into your brain
Why hello there everyone
how are you all doing
