I think his point is valid, even if the specific scenario isn’t necessarily desirable
Focusing on that is really missing like the whole argument
I think his point is valid, even if the specific scenario isn’t necessarily desirable
Focusing on that is really missing like the whole argument
If a single player of your faction can mess up your whole faction, that’s… really really bad
Suicide guilt literally does this
why do you think we’ve wanted to nerf Prince for so god damn long
Anyways guilt off topic but point is solid
Fool adds good wifom aspect
We’ve talked about this for years and out of the 20+ times I’ve asked you for any reasoning on how it’s good you’ve literally never had anything that wasn’t a meme
Had an epiphany yet?
I’ve always proven you wrong with objective arguments and you never could say anything
Quote em
It’s good cuz it’s fun
I don’t need to go back to threads we argued
It’s not too easy to win as Fool in ToL.
Have you ever seen ToL without the threat of Fool? Your argument falls apart once we consider that we’ve never exploited the potential of testing these kinds of changes out with a PTR to see if things get better or worse without Fool/guilt.
Also the idea that mislynches don’t stop you from that is ???
No no, you just need to understand mechanics
If you want to check for fool, you can ask a Drunk to check him
Drunk died N1
Now what
Making it rand-dependent is actually worse
i agree that creating psychological threats is fine in closed one-off setups but it’s very bad for setups that are intended to be played until the heat death of the universe
CW works too. Let the CW try to empower him. If it’s not “AIDED” it’s probably not a killer