But only in theory 
In practice I’ve never seen this… ever.
I have 
it’s literally one of the things the loading screen tips tell you to look out for
2 Likes
No…
I’m just between the sides. I’m very social for a ToL player, and very mechanical for a FoL player. I can theoretically play both (like a lot of us as well), but I prefer ToL more
some of N’s posts here feel like he’s just … playing a completely different game than I am? like, you claim you’ve never seen anyone even try to socially deduce, have you seriously never seen anyone look at the numbers of people who upped the Mastermind, or say things like ‘wow you were defending the super obvious evil I bet you’re evil too,’ or things like that?
3 Likes
A lot of players do that. Most newbies don’t, but if you have 100+ hours, most people start to do this.
1 Like
yes im sure i’ve never seen anyone do any strategy that wasn’t mechanical at its core, and im also sure i would have remembered if this had happened
looking at who voted up evils is something that happens in every game with competent players
1 Like
like there are plenty of players that I don’t even consider particularly good who do that
A very basic example: “fast trial”
it means “there was not enough resistence to this trial, the player is most likely BD because he got voted up by BD and evils alike.”
1 Like
that is not a social strategy, it’s a ToL meta. Of course i know about the metas that exist in ToL. They all become extremely barebones and stale after a while (and they’re all extremely counterable)
and that literally is a social strategy
it’s vote count analysis! that’s the thing that it is! it is entirely based on social interactions of how the players interact with each other!
3 Likes