[SFoL] SFoL 63 - Triple Threat: Virtuous - Game Over (4/26) - Blue Dragon (evils) win!

Your highest TRs effectively boil down to “They claimed they were bled.” Also how tf does one of your three highest TRs is just there for lacking WiM?

Why do you think my TR on Vulgard is a pocket?

Give examples?

How are them weird this game?

I am telling this now because I will do this as any faction: “You have felt wrong about me. Regardless of alignment, I have sworn to tunnel PKR, and therefore I am always doubtful whether I should or should not change my vote on PKR.”

I believe that scum!Zone might have either ignored you, or rather ignored this whole game in its entirety once I had voted PKR. Since “mindless tunneling” fits my (very) old town meta, I can probably get away by just slanking the game, completely ignoring everyone other than PKR.

Current VC

Voted Voters Votes
TheBlueElixir Moleland 1/14
Vulgard Intensify 1/14
Leafia Chloe, Soulshade55r, Italy, PsychoKang 4/14
Chloe Vulgard, Leafia, Surge, Alice 4/14
PokemonKidRyan Zone_Q11 1/14
ATNoName clonedcheese 1/14
Zone_Q11 SirDerpsALot 1/14
SirDerpsALot TheBlueElixir, Frostwolf103 2/14
Intensify ash4fun 1/14
Whysper Centuries 1/14

Ping me if there are any mistakes.

I’m not faking the bleed and that’s it.
I don’t do RTs like this, I hate RTs.

Discouraged to read any further, and honestly I dont do meta reads.

ok
/vote Leafia
parking my vote here for now

1 Like

Ah… I must’ve not seen this before. Thank you for answering.
Hm… so you believe that Intensify is a scum then?

That’s not my point. Everyone has their own way of viewing things and that’s the way things should be. But they never even explained how they found me wolfy and if they did, I must’ve missed it the short time I was a bit distracted by RL.[quote=“Zone_Q11, post:661, topic:83266”]
Regarding “it is too early”: Where I come from (NovelUpdates Forum), people do jack **** during D1 because nobody died. Does this mean that nobody was supposed to read anyone during D1?
The answer is “no”, it is never too early to read people.
[/quote]

You shouldn’t be going hard on your initial reads in case they’re wrong. Putting someone in your scumlock category less than an hour into D1 is stupid.[quote=“Zone_Q11, post:661, topic:83266”]

If it was BS, then how come other people are making a fuss about it? There are “only” six (6) scum in this game, yet I see more than six people be against you.
[/quote]

If I knew this, I’d be less confused. I think they’re letting themselves be swayed and not using good judgement.

Then how come you choose to push for Derps’ death, but not Leafia’s death?

Ah yes, because SDA claimed they were bled, also I’m finding a reason to find people I can trust currently. It’s not my fault they are the players I trust that were mentioned in the post.

Already stated this, can you actually read my posts instead of doing what Wiisp did in Joat^2.

My examples were literally for you to look at the ISO for, and surely you haven’t not-noticed it.

If I knew what was sensing me off about them I would’ve said. Clearly I’m unsure what’s weird about them it’s just rubbing me the wrong way nonetheless.

/unvote

/vote Whysper

cause why the hell not

I laughed so hard at this post.

1 Like

Hold on, SDA claimed a bleed?

Why exactly? SDA is not read through meta either.

Wait what?

i’d have to agree here
SDA CLAIMED BLEED???
can u like quote that post

Ok yeh I’m rereading this entire thread, I’ve definitely missed a lot of things

While I don’t agree with the second part, I don’t think you’d be like this as scum.

Stop dodging the question.

The point is that you’re TR’ing two players mostly because of how they claimed to be bleeding. How does this make them a villager?

Literally Wazza saying SDA claimed a bleed, I don’t recall it tho.