Oh no on mon ami. You’ll see
/guilty
For the record Simon, hanging noz has nothing to do with “neuts out” or whatever you said. In FoL we analyse each case individually and decide which lynch is optimal. We don’t just say “herpity derpity always hang teh neutral” or “derpity herpity never hang teh neutral”. Both of these are incredibly ignorant and a gross over-simplification of how to decide upon a lynch.
Those sort of blanket statements are unnecessary and have no place in a game of deduction which is different every time.
If you can give a valid reason as to why you don’t want to hang noz, such as you find someone else suspicious. As it is, saying “hey I wanna give neutrals a chance” is just an excuse to abstain which makes me incredibly suspicous of you.
3 Likes
NozBugz shouldn’t be on trial, but is currently at T-1. We apologise for the inconvenience.
can we get a VC? Just so we know A) who dies if he’s a cowardly king (should be me, i imagine) and b) who still needs to vote him up.
Votecount
NozBugz - 10 - Marluxion, orangeandblack5, Shurian, PolikShadowBliss, Livicus, Celeste_Ludenberg, Frostwolf103, Wolfy, Boss110, Vulgard
PokemonKidRyan - 1 - Hippolytus
20 people are alive, so 11 votes are required to lynch
/execute
Someone should read it’s fun,
By the way, I say myself again that I don’t like how Noz tries to get massclaim going on.
Btw.
Is anyone opposed to the plan of ; Scout Celeste AND Check Celeste? (if unseen game) / Prevent Conversion and Check Celeste? (If Cult game.)
This way we can get a confirmed good king on the Throne.
Yes, I realize the two main problems with this are A) It wastes a bunch of resources just securing a good king and B) Celeste will be king.
Alternatively we could just vote up another Royal and just not let Celeste on the throne. Since the odds of them being converted is slim.
