Part 3
Won’t exist.
Perssuasion techniques are mine.
But I mean it’s hard to tell.
Both parts seems… fine to read
Part 2 caught my attention more
it gave a concrete example of how to apply a theory in practice, as opposed to just giving theory.
you gave an example in Part 1 as well, but it was dry methodology (which for whatever reason I did find easier to read, but I went into a more scientific mindset in reading it, whereas I did not have to be in a scientific mindset to read Part 2… and I am assuming that’s what your point is)
(actually I probably found Part 1 easier to read because I already know the steps of the scientific method; I was just blatantly disregarding them in forum mafia)
Well, I probably didn’t break attention span limit with neither of them.
But if it broke, it would be probably easier to go back to part 2 and probably it was more memorable as well.
It also means you were personally interested in the talk itself. Good.
Ready for EoD 2 analysis attempt 3?
Part 2 was somewhat less memorable but I think my attention span broke after reading it
sure
but maybe after I sleep for a couple hours, since I have to be up early and i’m not a morning person whatsoever
We are both european, I can feel ya.
Ping me when you are ready tommorow and need someone to go through analysis and point out all the flaws.
I like pointing out flaws.
Me who is Canadian
Ngl I’m a little salty but this was a nice revisit of the fundamentals
So uhhh… you got any opinions on anyone?
Like, at all?
I thought faulting the PRs for outing themselves was kind of an opinion
Actually I do, I like PKR more than Windward.
Don’t tell Windward about this. :^)
But that’s kinda obvious, considering I literally slept at theirs house when I was there, meanwhile WA never invited me over ;-;
can’t argue with that tbh
Tbh I fault the PR’s for early outing, I gave them a gun but bruh did they shoot it
I think he meant it on either personal or aligment level.
Not sure.
And making bad plays doesn’t change my opinion on neither of them :^)