Ok, I see it, Moleland was being very antagonistic to Leafia
Just read 115 to 147 then. Itās a short interaction in my opinion.
Has your read on me changed now that you have reread that?
@katze
I have a question, your iso dive has Vulgard as someone who has posts written by a villager, yet you randomly ask for reads, āor dieā
like even with the context a few posts being, āI will look at you disapprovinglyā
I still donāt understand it
Ya after rereading everything your progression makes more sense
1 Like
i saw him in thread and remembered that i hadnāt seen much of him for a while
like i said in my thoughts posts he didnāt have that one post that convinced me he was a villager yet
but his posting has been fine and since then (just caught up) I think heās still moderately towny
still havenāt seen the post to lock it in though
(also the wording was half a reference to a prior game)
Like, if wagons are V/V then Flameo failing to say anything meaningful about either of them is a horrendous look.
1 Like
Moleland ISO
This one pings me hard. They say theyāre interested in someone defending someone else, but instead of asking why or looking for good/bad reasoning, they just call it scummy and move on. Also this is hedgy af.
This just feels like open shading. Leafiaās posts that these reference seem reasonable to me, and afaict thereās literally nothing here.
I disagree with this. In context, the extra bit makes sense coming from town. Mole again feels like heās pushing nothing.
I think I like this even less than the original. Theyāre backpedaling on a hedge and shading. Like wtf
More backtracking, theyāve been calling leafia bad (if not scummy) the whole game. nvm this is about what happened in anther game.
I didnāt see anything about this beforeā¦
Hypocritical much?
To be completely honest, Iām not seeing any of that.
Thatās a lot of nulls. Seems consistent with what theyāve posted so far, tho.
I donāt really understand how āIām pretty sure this is scumā is only āweakscumā. Could be consistent with scum trying to not offend, could just be how they label stuff doesnāt really reflect the strength of the read as Iām used to.
So thereās my case on Mole.
Going through the iso, Iām finding a lot of stuff I consider wolfy like shading and hedging. Also more nullreads than I think a normal town player should have at this point in the game.
One thing I didnāt really find was agenda though. They donāt seem to actually be trying to push the exe or town consensus any particular direction.
So yeah this is why I think mole is the exe for today. Itād make me happy if someone did something of the same sort for me, but it might be too late in the day for that.
TL;DR:
yāall should vote mole
I can say I really didnt like his wall above with the quick fire answers to quotes (Vulgard I mean)
Paragraph 1: Mole shades a lot, hedges a lot, and has too many nullreads. Scummy.
Paragraph 2: But he has no agendaā¦
Paragraph 3: But he should still die.
Paragraph 4: You should vote him.
I feel like thereās something off about this progression. Itās like you saw signs of towniness (lack of agenda) and decided to ignore them (you want Mole dead anyway).
The only thing preventing me from swapping me vote is that the progression is rather blatant.
1 Like
Those two read lists are pretty awful, and the modifiers just seem unnecessary
like wth even is a weak-null
this is so level-0
his thoughts on Flameo are fine
this post is a reach
this is a lie
who has played with Mole before?
My decision was that if they are just trying to float around and avoid suspicion, they wouldnāt look like theyre trying to misexe townies.
Youāre a lie.
Weak null is that I donāt like there fluffiness but Iām not sure it is town or scum
If you addressed my points instead of ignoring or sidestepping them, then I would have no need to bring them up again.
This is objectively false, I have been vocal on Ashe.