In SFoL 61, Seth was an Evil King. Postcount by EoD2 = 118
In Insurgency, Seth was groupscum Postcount by Mid-D2 (his death) = 263
In WoW:BfA, Seth was groupscum Postcount by EoD2 = 216
In NUF, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 256
In FoL28, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 117
In ToS2, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 407
In DGADT, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 429
In Hell in a Cell, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 151
In RMIV, Seth was town Postcount by EoD2 = 65
Scum Average = 199 Town Average = 272
(No significant outliers)
This game Postcount by EoD2 = 129
Conclusion: There isnāt enough data to determine if postcount is alignment-indicative. Towngames are not consistent enough to compare to scumgames.
Time to focus on the content of these posts.
Keep in mind there is no GK game to compare to, and groupscum games are not a fair comparison, as EK doesnāt have TMI - so this isnāt solid evidence of alignment.
Content Comparisons
Distinct difference in answers. Iām unsure how to determine alignment based on these answers, but I would love some insight from others.
Weirdass performative post.
Mentions Allies quite a few times, including asking players to guess a number. Never mentioned allies d1 in SFoL62
In SFoL61, Seth backs up every read with analysis on posts, whereas in SFoL61 he just posts his thoughts without reasoning.
Self-aware in SFoL61, commenting on playstyle changes & reasoning for lack of activity. No mention of these in SFoL62.
Similar thought-process on trials. However, on d2 in SFoL61, Seth votes players for pressure, and decides to save his trial. In 62, he doesnāt vote, and immediately uses trial. Still hasnt voted
Seth doesnāt post a single readslist in SFoL61. Posts multiple in SFoL62. Also provides no reasonings, just placements. Seems overly concerned with providing reasonings in SFoL61.
āFineā with being poisoned in SFoL61, likely in an attempt to look more towny. Is actively against a poison in SFoL62.
Iām running short on time, so Iām wrapping this up. I actually think Seth was more active in SFoL61 in comparison to here. In 61 he seems focused on appearing townie, whereas he justā¦ doesnāt give a shit in the current game.
Still not sure as to why she thought I was defending her back then since I said I found it curious that she didnāt refute Janeās points, but yeah.
I guess I could see a world where one would think this is some kind of hedge?
This is just a plain question about my read.
This reads more like they expected me to provide more points as to why I think Gorta is towny, not ānot taking a stanceā.
Iāve already made my stance on Anstreim, I didnāt feel like I needed to make a big show on it.
Havenāt felt the need to reevaluate this read yet as weāve only had one flip and Anstreim has still felt fairly townie. Plus the whole PK situation makes it sound like Anstreim is very unlikely to be Cult/Unseen, in which case the worst he can be is the NK?
Not too concerned with him being NK as of right now, since NK still need wolves out. I also just donāt think heās NK, but Iām not going to pretend Iām some expert NK hunter.
I see no reason to out Emiliaās targets.
You say you have information on her/Centuries, and that it might potentially be a redcheck.
Keyword being āpotentiallyā.
Is narrowing down Executioner PoE even by asking for their N1/N2 actions worth it? Do you have anything on them other than mech?
Well, I was planning on keeping this for later (which is why I backtracked on it earlier with the intent of looking like I had misread my results), but given Wazzas current actions:
/vote Wazza
Iāll take you spewing Emilia as town as good enough.