I vividly remember that one slot in a game offsite where they posted in an underwhelming way, and very little too. However, they stepped it up in LyLo and were really openly nervous during every EoD, even when they were not being wagoned. It was pure. I didnāt see it then, but it really was pure.
Unwilling to jump on LHF easily for that reason, but Iām ready to flip if they donāt get better.
Nah, sleep tight.
This is relevant, by the way. I wanna build a consensus and work from there.
To be fair, if we look at her last towngame as a baseline, sheās performing significantly worse this game. Analysis is a lot more shallow, far less investment in the game, too.
And yes, I do know sheās currently the 3rd top poster, Iām just waiting for any analysis that goes beyond the surface level. Show some depth of thought, please.
Also, 0-posters should stop being 0-posters. Iām terrible at reading gorta, I might as well say this ahead of time, so Iād appreciate it if people would help me out with that.
Take a look at NewD3, she was Venus there. And yes, I understand that she received more pressure in that game, but even unprompted, she generated more advanced content than here.
You must be joking if you think thereās no notable difference. Tone aside, āVenusā is significantly more invested in solving. Not really seeing that this game upon re-reading their ISO. Most of sulitās posts are oneliners, thatās why her postcount is so large.
Compare the depth of this take to literally any read she made in NewD3. Now, holding her up to NewD3 standards might be a little much (since she deliberately changed her tone in order to keep her identity hidden), but the volume and complexity of her reads is like night and day.
Whether that makes her scum is up for debate, but you dismissing my case on her as baseless is ignorant at best and wolfy at worst. The differences are blatant.
ā¦Not really? In here sheās just throwing reads around seemingly at random. In NewD3, her takes were actually backed up by reasoning. She was also directly engaging with people.
Here, she just expresses suspicion on Wazza because he hasnāt posted (which could have been the case for a multitude of reasons), and when he enters the thread, she talks to him like this.
Not only do I think this meta is wrong, but sheās not scumreading him based on what heās actually written; she just keeps using the meta argument and taking advantage of the fact Wazza hasnāt done much yet. It feels like a really forced and inexplicable read. Sure, Iām just going to vote gorta now and say heās scum because he hasnāt posted either.
In short, it feels like bullshit, and Iād like an explanation beyond āoh, he hasnāt posted much, must be scum.ā Maybe use the things heās actually written? I donāt think heās posted anything particularly AI, but you should be using his posts in this game to get a read, not continuously claiming that he doesnāt have energy as scum. Heā¦ does have energy as scum. Iāve seen him powerwolf several times. I was on a team with him and he powerwolfed. I know heās capable of it.
Come on, even in new D3, which has recently finished and where Sulit played against scum!Wazza as town, he tried to get town to quickhammer a villager in final 5. I wouldnāt call that ālow energy play,ā thatās pretty proactive. He was also the fourth top poster in that game.
Sulitās take in our current game doesnāt make much sense to me the more I read it.
Is it wolfy? Iām not sure. She could have low WiM for some reason, or maybe she didnāt think things through.
Is it different from her last game as town? Absolutely.