[VFM] JoaT^2 - (6/15) - šŸ˜¹ Pirates (Town) Win!

Iā€™m going to do more tomorrow,

far too tired to bother posting anything about the game state and such.

Are you saying you would be townreading everyone that had posted at that point?

Bookmarking: 299.

Yā€™all wrote 304 posts. Could be worse, I guess.

Doesnā€™t come from a wolf who is aware that hedging is considered scummy. Two paragraphs with no conclusion about Molelandā€™s alignment. I suppose this read is a mixture of TWTBAW and my belief that wolves are self-aware.

Either way, still thinking CatLover is town.

And by the way, fake solving as mafia is fun too, but Iā€™m still bad at it, so itā€™s more difficult.

Maybe people will stop complaining about not understanding my reads when I learn how to use words to explain them well.

Please explain this point in more detail for me.

Contradiction in this post for me. You apparently say that they are easily pushable while having a deceptive amount of skill, yet you then locktown them for one post while they apparently had a deceptive amount of skill according to you.

Why? Also that is a slight misrepresentation. My stance was that they are actively encouraging to stop finding scum in the current players posting.

You had to throw in two conditionals hereā€¦, yet still found it valid enough for a vote? Why not take more of my overall posts into account?

So who else should I have addressed with my vote? I remember having everyone else either starting to resolve themselves more or being less scummy.

Silly? It seemed quite genuine to me to be honest.

Isnā€™t Mole just scum for this like I am? Are you giving our slots different treatment?

I guess you donā€™t need to worry about them being LHF, Vulgard?

I find it funny that you follow it up with this, while I have had the same take, but you didnā€™t mention any of that association. Have you read all my posts?

Ah yes, I do love being asked 10 questions I donā€™t have the answer to in one post. How much do you care about me answering any of them?

I have to work now, but will catch up more once Iā€™m back again. I agree with some of the sentiments I skimmed that itā€™d be nice if you can keep your posts to the point. :slight_smile:

Are they such difficult questions then? I would love if youā€™d address all of them. If you do, you might switch your stance, or give me a bigger insight in you.

I will answer any questions you have too? Does that sound fair? You can find my partners that way, rightā€¦?

I think you really overestimate the strength of my wolfread on you.

Ah! Hello Vulgard and Flameo.
Here right as I am about to hit the hay. I suppose I can stay here a short while longer, as I wanted to interact with you two.

Forgive me if Iā€™m missing something, but is there a point to this post? It is rather confusing. I canā€™t tell if this is self-meta, or a joke. I donā€™t have a good understanding of who here uses sarcasm.

I see we found the same contradiction. Curious if you read my post first, or saw this on your own?
I quite like the ā€œvibeā€ I get from this entire post.
They have analyzed Vulgardā€™s posts deeper than I did, and this feels well-formed; rather solid points.

If it helps motivate you, I would also appreciate answers to the questions Flameo asked - at least the non-hypotheticals. It may help me understand your thought-process in more detail.

I donā€™t follow it either. This is why Iā€™m bad at explaining reads.

My main problem with Mole right now is exactly this. Good grief, Iā€™m just going to use other peopleā€™s explanations as mine this game.

Vulgard,
I donā€™t want to distract you as you catch up on the thread. I saw you mention that you were behind by three hundred posts.
Please do take your time.

My post with the vote on Flameo is less complicated than you guys make it sound. I think itā€™s a wolfy vote, and I have an associative read if Iā€™m right, but if Iā€™m wrong, then the associative doesnā€™t exist. I prefer to make that clear so wolves donā€™t use that to misyeet two people in a row somehow.

1 Like

I quite like this answer. Perhaps I was misunderstanding the wording you used alongside your vote.
You seem to believe this, and it does not sound like forced reasoning.

Thank you.

In general, I feel like a lot of players this game are overcomplicating everything and maybe thatā€™s what makes me a bit annoyed.

Towny exchange in my opinion, on both sides.

Possibly W/W too but I find both of them independently villagery. Sulit seems free-flowing and sheā€™s far more level-headed as a wolf. Wispā€™s borderline shitposting is a decent look because I think it shows a high level of comfort in the thread.

To be fair, Iā€™ve never seen Wisp as a wolf, so this read might be meaningless meta-wise, but I think his posts are villagery independently from meta.

??? Thatā€™s not my experience with him at all, heā€™s a good wolf and I always got the impression he enjoyed being a wolf.

His reaction was surprisingly hostile for a bystander.

I think this take is something V!Leafia writes way more often than W!Leafia. I believe W!Leafia jumps to a conclusion about CatLoverā€™s alignment more readily. This feels like a natural progression into that.

Like, come on, guys. Look at these posts and tell me this isnā€™t LHF. I sense immense LHF energies.

Maybe I was wrong about calling their posts LHFy on purpose, but either way, yeah.

Early readlist with tons of nulls is admittedly :/. Why did you feel the need to post this?

This feels organic