Usually I jsut end up townreading everyone that posts first but this time Im scumreading many of the initial posters.
18/101
I did care about it in the recent HoB game, you were in it too, so this pocket on sulit+ignoring relatively simple info tells me scummy tbh
His reads on Wazza and Vulgard felt really heavy to me too.
33
Okay I should stop oh no
1 Like
Interesting, I cant tell if sulit is a pocket or a teammate though, I’ll look more into their reactions after work
Eh. I was meming mostly because I was waiting for people to get in there.
I like EVO’s posts so far, honestly.
Napoleon is super likely V based on his contributions to the game so far, aggressively pushing and leading, and investment in the game he’s incapable of imitating as wolf.
Who joined this game knowing it was nightless?
Point out where, please.
I feel like their entrance would be just unnecessary as wolf. They get into arguments with sulit and Universal over the content of their early posts, arguments which don’t seem like they were started in bad faith. It doesn’t look like setup for a push, more like a genuine questioning stage, if that makes any sense.
I like EVO’s posts because it doesn’t feel like they are care about their image whatsoever.
Feels really natural. I dislike the hedging but I think the V pings are stronger than W pings.
The posts seem natural and not stilted. The tone is good, too.
To be honest, his declaration of doing that in the middle of randomly voting people and then… continuing to randomly vote people feels like a villagery uncaring attitude.
Also this is a mood.
I think Hippo as wolf feels more scared in the thread than this.
Cool I’ve been towned by vulgard, someone @ me at mylo till then best of luck.
1 Like
The Village:
Napoleon
EVO
Eevee (assuming they don’t start pushing agenda.)
Hippolytus (feels a bit early to make the read on Hippo. Probably the most flippable read here.)
0-posters:
DatBird
DryBones
Nightfall
Appel
Null Zone / Wolves:
Sulit (might be V, but I’m not convinced yet. Would like an explanation from Nappy regarding why and how he’s melding.)
Universal
Wazza
Still thinking Wazza was trying to fake the derpclear.
I am pocketing sulit.
As a townie.
That exists btw.
And I like their paranoia to me too as a wolf could easily instantly townread me instead to play a reverse pocket.
I personally took your previous reads on Vulgard and Wazza as NAI just because:
Virtuous you mean? If so, you are scum in that game lol.
Though, if you are bringing it up anyways I’ll assume that you do truly believe about this vote thingy.
you too didn’t know this game was nightless either wow
This is a hasty assumption.
Not the “pocketing logic” as upon self-eval I can see where this comes from.
What suggests to you the possibility of a Nappy/sulit scumteam?
This is noted and I will use it again upon evaluation when you post again.
Okay see I would agree with you but like I think EVO’s d1 gave me townvibes in Virtuous (even though I was evil) and I remember it being for a similar reason. (until I took some of his memes too seriously).
II’m still reading EVO as null but they will definitely post more before EoD which would be cool.
@EVO read this post please so it doesn’t get buried because i want answers
Vulgard, as for your question.
I kinda just jumped at this post because this was exactly what I was thinking at this point of time (until I re-evaled Wazza based on reaction and etc.) Wazza is still is null territory.
1 Like
I feel like EVO was much more aggressive as NK in that game, here I see them actually trying to read people and have thoughts that feel villagery. I can’t really describe this read very well, I just don’t see the aggression I saw emanating from them when they were solo wolfing.
Fair read on sulit. Do you think me or Wazza’s alignment changes your read on sulit? Or do you think it’s the same perspective 100% of the time and you two are always villa?
I’m pretty sure you’re villa, so.
???
What? Can you quote where tf you got that part from?
It was 9 before the vote and it was 9 after the vote. I wrote it correctly.
10/101
