If youāre referring to my iso of you, Iām pretty sure I did it in 2nd person because thatās how I promised I would make the iso
put it this way:
Promises to make iso of āeeveeā -> makes iso of āhimā
Promises to āyouā to make iso of āyouā -> makes iso of āyouā
I was making the iso primarily for myself of course, so tbh I didnāt even notice the person I wrote it in. The above is an attempt to describe my subconsious decision.
[quote=āash4fun, post:1754, topic:82422, full:trueā]
I mean, youāre not wrong. If everything youāre doing is part of a fun>teamwork strategy, I suppose that makes bad play NAI.
Except I refuse to accept that nothing youāre doing is AI, so Iāll read you for what youāre doing, regardless.
iirc TWL was rather commonly townreadā¦ a bit curious ig, doesnāt seem genuine.
Creative claim. I have trouble believing that you think claiming D1 is a good idea under not-right-about-to-be-cuddled circumstances. Your supposed action works D1 and N1,2,3ā¦?
Itās my understanding that mech clearing has caused town to lose a fair number of games hereā¦ yet you argue you should be towncoreād for it? I guess itās a logical extension of your (pretty bad) attempt at cop cover, but stillā¦
this is fine.
doesnāt really do anything if anyone can nominate.
if nominations have to be approved, well thatās a whole 'nother issue. Who approves it? You? You could be scum gating everybody from voting deepwolves. Top townies? Weāre fallible too, silencing people, right or wrong, only helps scum.
FTFY
I donāt suppose you caught the glaring hypocrisy here?
This isnāt the only pool you proposed, but you proposing lynch pools that are incredibly restrictive, and not consensus in any way does literally nothing to help town.
first sentence good
lynch pool literally does nothing but restrict townies. Scum can push mislyches even with your littlest pool. Town gets astronomically less information if voting is restricted this way.
providing content =/= town, butā¦
wolf is wolf is wolf, spews or no. Thereās literally so many other ways to get information, this argument is just bad.
I still canāt say I buy it but I do think making a super hard push for using āyouā is silly, even if it gives me a bad feeling. Can you do another one of those isoās/cases? That one was difficult for me to critically analyze minus the 2nd person language as it was an ISO on me and itās difficult to look at if what you are saying makes sense, objectively.
Iām going to take a look at katze, and try to squeeze what reads I can out of them I can that is between all of the meme posts.
Iāve actually been meaning to do one on mole for a bit. Iāve got a ~45min thing to do at 1130 but Iāll start on that.
I just took the first cases I could find.
You canāt expect me to sift through a 400 post ISO to prove a point when I have already provided what I feel is sufficient evidence.
I will look at the wall you quoted, however, and re-evaluate that point with this new evidence in mind.
Derps is slipping hard into his randompush on any potential townies he can find, which I hate, even if it is townindicative of him.
I know youāre able to tey and convince me
but then why is it that ure not even trying to attempt that
Me, pushing the PoE I gave earlier, is random pushing
Good to know, thanks leafia
After reading that post, I have decided that I think my point is still valid! I am not going to put as much stock in it before, but, of the āyouā sentences quoted in that specific post, 3/4 were questions. I still do not get a good feeling from the way he addressed āyouā specifically in the conclusion, as that should be the climax and summary of the post and it felt like he still only cared if I saw it.
Iāll concede a little bit on the point, but this new evidence is not enough to convince me to move my vote. My current thoughts on that slot are on hold anyways, until he makes another case, on moleland I assume, like he promised me to.
